With Milan sitting down with Brescia for possible deffered payment of Tonali’s 25M Split as 15M option on loan and 10M bonus rumours have now emerged that Brescia are not willing to discount Tonali’s asking price and are looking for new buyers for the player.
Tonali had a very mixed season that there would be good arguments from his supporters and his naysayers alike on whether he was good for the team or not. Let’s take a look at a few reasons as to why Milan should redeem Tonali.
Potential at the age of 21
Tonali is one of the youngest and brightest prospects in Italian football. Finishing 13th in the Golden Boy award 2019 Tonali had high expectations when he finished the 2019/20 season at Brescia. There was a derby in the market for Tonali and finally his boyhood club Milan snapped him up.
While Tonali was used in a 4-3-3 by coach Corini at Brescia and was the undisputed starter, Milan played a 4-2-3-1 and had competition in the form of Kessie and Bennacer. The roles differed vastly, at Brescia playing as a regista Tonali was flanked by 2 mezzala’s and they shared the defensive burden.
At Milan Tonali played in a double pivot where Pioli used him as the deep lying playmaker along with duties of maintaining a narrow 2nd line of defense as well as press opponents. This exposed him to much more duties than usual and at his age it was a bit too much. However as the season progressed we could see that Tonali was settling into the role more until injuries hampered his season and Meite was started to be preffered by Pioli.
Penetrative passing and passing option
One of Tonali’s distinctive traits at Brescia was to play penetrating pass that would split the lines. We got quite a demonstration of this vs Lille when Tonali played on Rebic for his eventual assist for Castillejo. His ability to generate passes at certain angles are also an asset.
I mentioned earlier how Tonali slowly grew into his role. One example of how he was good for acting as a DLP or even helping to bring the ball out from the back was when Kalulu was pressed by Cagliari front 3. Tonali easily acted as a 3rd passing option and helped Milan beat the first line of press before he went on a run to beat his marker.
His Athletic data
Modern footballers are extremely quick and most of the sprint speeds are recorded by forward players or the full backs. For a Defensive midfielder Tonali has recorded one of the quickest sprint speed in Serie A against Fiorentina when he recorded 35.03 kmp/h. This data shows how athletically Tonali has very sound physical ability.
The homegrown UEFA role
When fielding a 23 man squad, every team are expected to field 8 homegrown players. According to UEFA homegrown players are defined as those who have spent 3 years in the relevant club’s country (in this case it is Italy) between the ages 15-21.
With Milan having lost Donnarumma and the future of Caldara and Alessio in limbo, Milan would need to fill the quota with Primavera players. With Tonali Milan can have a quality addition to the homegrown quota that can compete in the squad.
The Player actually wants to play for Milan
Maldini in the past has spoken about how players are asked to make an economic sacrifice when signing for Milan owing to poor finances and FFP issues. The “will” of the player is paramount in these situations and Tonali is a fan of Milan since his childhood and the player wants to be part of Milan in its resurgence.
FINAL VERDICT
While we can only qualitatively speak about the player, the fans cannot speak to the financial situation of the club and it is only something the people in power can handle.
The prowess of Maldini, Massara and Gazidis in the market , making the squad competitive with small investments, have shown the tifosi that Milan can be great again and as a fan I trust in them whatever be their final decision.a
After 7 long seasons, Milan have made it to the UEFA Champions League. The various expiriments, projects, permutations and combinations have finally yielded a return for Milan in the most elite competitions.And for a team that has achieved this milestone but would like to grow stronger is with 2 actions- Strengthen the team in the transfer market and reward existing performers in the team.
Milan have already started making a moves in the transfer market redeeming Tomori and signing Mike Maignan as replacement for contract rebel Gigio Donnarumma and as a result have spent 42 Million in the transfer market in the space of a week (with amortization it becomes 8.3 Million a season).
Now comes the renewal part. Milan are in negotiations with Frank Kessie and Davide Calabria to reward them for their stellar season and if rumors are to be believed even Theo Hernandez may be in for a renewal. There is also the big conundrum in the form of Alessio Romagnoli’s renewal.
Surely but now Milan would have learnt their lesson from the protracted renewal saga with Donnarumma and despised agant Mino Raiola with Donnarumma famously telling Maldini “I do what Mino tells me”.
Alessio and Donnarumma have a lot of similarities. Both players have been in Milan since their underperforming days especially with Alessio rejecting a move to Chelsea to stay in Milan and Milan rewarding his loyalty with a 4 year contract in 2018 (with a different agent). But the most disturbing similarity is that they both are the clients of Raiola.
Surely Raiola would not so easily forget the bad press Milan and Maldini subjected his client Donnarumma to after Donnarumma tried to hold the club ransom to get them to pay him a lucrative 10M per season contract making him the world’s best paid keeper.
The renewal of Alessio has been a much debated topic with supporters of his renewal wanting Milan to reward his loyalty while his naysayers would like him to leave the club while he has some value as they feel Milan can find a better player suited to Stefano Pioli’s style of play.
If anything Milan have learned from Donnarumma it is for Milan to take a stand much like how they have done for the renewal of Hakan and Donnarumma’s renewal. Renew at a reasonable rate or leave the club and with an ultimatum to answer the club within a specified time period.
With Romagnoli down to his last year his book value i.e the value of the asset in the books (in this case the asset is the player) is Zero and this means that if milan sell Romagnoli at, let’s say close to 15M, it would be a plus valenza (pure profit) of 15M and it would help Milan to balance the books even further.
Milan had an opportunity to sell Donnarumma last season when he had 1 year left but with a pandemic hit economy no suitors came for the keeper and the club was confident of keeping the player. But now it is time we learned from our mistake and take a stand.
With more wide television broadcasting, football in the 90s was slowly starting to peak with Italian football at its zenith. Calcio 90 as it is fondly called in Italy saw Italian football producing some of the finest footballers to grace the turf. Roberto Baggio, Paolo Maldini, Franco Baresi, Paolo Cannavaro and the list goes on.
A huge chunk of this was facilitated by the competitiveness of the league with Napoli led by Diego Armando Maradona and Sampdoria led by Mancini and Vialli. Perhaps one of the greatest feats in that period for Italian football was Sampdoria beating Italian giants Napoli, Milan, Inter and Juventus to the Scudetto.
With this article we take a look at “Super Sampdoria” a meteoric rise of a team that dominated Italian football before falling.
HISTORY
Sampdoria did not exist as a club until 1945. However on 12th August 1946, 2 Genoaese clubs, Ginnastica Comunale Sampierdarenese and Ginnastica Andrea Doria merged toghether to form U.C Sampdoria.
Following years of mid-table finishes in the 60s, Sampdoria fell into financial trouble and later had to sell their players without adequate investment without investments like the unpopular sale of Bruno Mora to Juventus. Sampdoria took part in the Inter-Cities Fair’s Cup (now defunct) but couldn’t get past round of 32. And even with the arrival of Luis Suarez, Giovanni Lodetti and a young Marcelo Lippi Sampdoria was constantly flirting with relegation in the 70’s before the eventual happed in 1976.
MANTOVANI: THE SAVIOUR
In 1977 Sampdoria was purchased by business man Paulo Mantovani who promised fans immediate promotion and the dream: A scudetto win. On his 4th managerial appointment Mantovani achieved his first promise: a promotion to Serie A under the coach Renzo Ulivieri in the 1981/82 season.
The legendary Mantovani
Sampdoria won the first major silverware in their 84/85 season beating AC Milan in a 2 legged final of the Coppa Italia final under the tutelage of the coach Eugenio Bersillini. With heavy investment from Mantovani, Sampdoria general manager Paolo Borea was able to bring in Liam Brady, Graeme Souness, Luca Pellegrini, Roberto Mancini, Mannini and Fausto Salsano. This brought in a perfect blend of youth and experience.
If Sampdoria fans thought this was this was the highest they could achieve they were in for a surprise.
VUJADIN BOSKOV: THE CONQUERER
In 1986 Mantovani brought in the Ascoli trainer Vujadin Boksov and together they signed future club legends Vialli, Pagiluca, Toninho Cerezo giving the team an extra edge. The team set about winning 2 back to back Coppa Italia titles defeating Torino in 87/88 and Napoli in 88/89. This automatically qualified them for the European Cup winners’ Cup and while they lost the Cup in 89 they defeated Anderlecht 2-0 in the final in 1990 with 2 goals from Gianluca Vialli in Extra Time.
Vujadin Boskob Coppa Italia 1989 winners
SCUDETTO AND EUROPEAN CUP FINALS
The winning habit did not end with this. Sampdoria sent shockwaves in Italian football when they won the scudetto defeating Lecce 3-0 at home and winning the league with 1 game to spare. This at a time when Inter were scudetto champions, Milan was dominating Europe, Napoli was its peak with Maradona and Juventus had invested big on Baggio and Julio Cesar. Mantovani had kept one his promises and Sampdoria which had never won gone beyond 4th finally won a scudetto
Samdpria 90/91 Scudetto Winmers
With Sampdoria winning the Scudetto they qualified to the UEFA European Cup. They defeated Rosenborg, Budapest, Red Star Belgrade, and Anderlecht and faced Cryuff’s Barcelona in the final.
END OF THE CYCLE
The 1991/92 season started with silverware for Sampdoria beating Roma in the Super Coppa but their Scudetto defense fizzed out as they finished 6th in the season. However supporters had another reason to the thrilled. Sampdoria was scheduled to play Barcelona in a UEFA European Cup Final at Wembley.
A tight match ensured with Cryuff’s Barcelona playing free flowing football while Sampdoria played a cautious game-plan and countered and while it went to extra time both teams missed golt edged chances to win it for their team. In the end, Ronald Koeman hit a free kick past Pagiluca to break Sampdoria hearts and send the European trophy for the 1st time out of 5 times to the Camp Nou
Boskov, Vialli, Pari, Cerezo all departed and Mantovani responded by signing Ruud Gullit, Alberigo Evani and David Platt. However David Mantovani passed away from long standing illness and Sampdoria won their 4th Coppa Italia as a tribute for the great man.
Sampdoria had 2 more 8th place finishes before they went into relegation and need further investment from different owners to bring the club to where we know them today.
TACTICAL ANALYSIS OF SAMPDORIA AGAINST BARCELONA
ANALYSIS
Barcelona on paper started with a 4-3-3 formation with Laudrup acting as a false 9 while Sampdoria played a 4-4-2 with Lanna as a libero and Mancini-Vialli forming a lethal strike partnership.
Lanna as the Libero
Barcelona on the field were practically inspired by Rinus Michels’ total football Ajax thanks to their legendary player and coach Johan Cryuff.
Barcelona played a 3-4-3 on the ball forming a midfield diamond with Guardiola acting as a deep lying playmaker while acting as a shield to make sure the team does not lose shape.
Guardiola acting as a DLP. Whenever a CB would make a forward run he would cover for the Overlapping CB
Both Guardiola and Koeman were tasked as playmakers from midfield whenever Barcelona got the ball.
Barcelona pressed high, maintained a high line and used Koeman or Guardiola to bring the ball out from the back.
Miachel Laudrup acted as a false 9 dropping into half allowing Salinas or Stoichkov to move infield while Laudrup acted as a makeshift Trequartista.
Bakero and Eusebio often floated while Juan Carlos looked to stay wide. Barcelona formed passing triangles on the wings which facilitated quicker passing out from the back.
Forming passing triangles
Sampdoria meanwhile employed a variation of the catenaccio employed by majority of the teams from Italy at that period called as the Zona Mista or “The Italian way”
Sampdoria were also a threat from corners with Lombardi forcing a save of Zubizaretta
They employed a mix of man marking and zonal marking esp against a false 9 like Laudrup to negate the zonal aspect of Cryuff’s aspect.
Sampdoria except Mancini and Vialli sat deeper employed a passive pressing approach and tried to suck Barcelona into their usual high line. Once they won the ball back the sweeper, Lanna would launch vertical balls into Mancini or Vialli.
Blocking the center of the goal.
However employing an aggressive press Barcelona were able to neutralize the Sampdoria’s Center backs not allowing them to hit accurate long balls by having Laudrup and/or Salinas, Stoichkov to press the CB’s
Front-line press
A lot of this pressing did leave space between Barcelona lines something Mancini tried to thrive in
Space between the lines
In the second half with Barcelona players more tired playing a very taxing style of football spaces started opening up and Sampdoria started counter-attacking on their left targeting Mundo putting Lombardo on a 1v1 with him
The counter-attack
Vialli then would make infield runs to collect through balls behind the Barcelona defense hit by Pari or Mancini and run through on goal
CONCLUSION
Sampdoria was one of those teams that rode the way of the good times of Italian football. Whether Sampdoria can get back to the top of the Italian hierarchy is a different question given how the Milanese clubs and Juventus have un-matched spending power and resources but if anybody benefits from Samp’s rise its Italian Calcio.
With the 2020/21 season set to culminate on Sunday, Milan, after an electric start to the season have one more matchday to save their season and it is a daunting trip to their bogey team, Atalanta in Bergamo.
Milan fans need no mentioning of the score the last time Milan went to Bergamo Illicic bagging a brace. Milan are however in a desperate need of a win against Atalanta.
Milan don’t need to look back far to see when their last win came at Bergamo. They defeated Atalanta 3-1 in 2019 thanks to a brace from Milan’s in-form striker Piatek and a long distance shot from Hakan cancelling out Remo Freuler’s open.
Mid-week Juve pushed Atalanta to a 2-1 loss in the Coppa Italia final with Atalanta yet again missing out on silverware in another brilliant yet underwhelming season.
Here are some Tactical Similarities used by Gattuso and Pirlo to defeat Atalanta
CEDE POSESSION
Atalanta are a team that enjoys lion’s share possession and has the physical and technical qualities to knock it around an opposition defense, even parked buses that any team that tries to win the ball back with pressing they can get steam rolled
Pirlo and Gattuso however were content with Letting Atalanta keep the ball and knock it horizontally.
In the 2019 match Gattuso’s Milan had 41% possession while Pirlo’s Juve had 43% on Wednesday.
4-5-1 AND AN AVERAGE LINE
Of course, owing to the difference in technical and physical quality Pirlo’s Juve was better than Rino’s Milan and hence were able to play a higher line than what Rino did.
But compared to Juve’s regular standards they played a deeper line than before as shown in the graphic below and did not commit numbers forward. If Cuardado ventured forward on the right, bentancur and Mckennie stayed behind to prevent Atalanta’s lightning quick counters.
Juve’s 4-5-1
When Milan played against Atalanta they played a much deeper line and rarely ventured forward especially after taking the lead.
Milan’s 4-5-1
Both teams in terms of defensive structure played a narrow 4-5-1 that at times looked like a 4-4-1-1 keeping only one player forward with a second striker playing off the number 9. For Juventus it was Cristiano while for Milan it was Piatek.
PREVENTING WIDE OVERLOADS
One main feature of Atalanta was to numerically create advantages towards the wide areas of the pitch. For example whenever the ball was hoisted forwards Duvan Zapata would peel off towards the left and he would be joined by Gosens, Pessina and De Roon or Palomino. Creating this advantage would mean more passing combinations for Atalanta to exploit and therefore be lethal.
Pirlo countered this with their narrow 4-5-1 structure as explained before. They had their wide players drop in while the full back, the concerned CB and one player of the Double Pivot making it a 4v4 or a 5v4 not allowing Atalanta ot build on the flanks.
Juve preventing the wide overload. Juve players numbered in black, Atalanta marked in white
For Gattuso it was more of the same with Alessio, Rodriguez,Paqueta, Hakan and at times bakayoko creating a 5v3 or a 4v3 to prevent the numerical advantage.
Milan preventing the wide overload. Milan players numbered in black, Atalanta marked in white
NOT PLAYING OUT FROM THE BACK
One big feature of Milan’s loss in January was how Atalanta would press Milan whenever Milan had a Goal Kick or a free kick in their defensive 3rd. Atalanta would press Milan and Milan would lose the ball.
Buffon kicking the ball out instead of passing
Both Gattuso and Pirlo who otherwise preferred to play out from the back preferred a more direct approach choosing to kick it out to Cristiano (Piatek in Milan’s case).
The one time Juve played out from the back, they paid for it with Atalanta’s equalizer from malinovskyi.
Atalanta press Juventus and catch them passing out from the back and score
DIRECT, VERTICAL FOOTBALL AND COUNTER-ATTACK
Atalanta are a high press side and hence they play a very high line to facilitate their press. This leaves a lot of space behind the defense for the opposition to exploit.
Liverpool with Klopp used Salah and Mane exploited this feature and subjected Atalanta to a 5-0 loss.
Juventus chose the similar route chose to counter through Kulusevski and Chiesa which gave them their first goal. Cuardado made a clearance which was a vertical ball to Ronaldo and it caught out Atalanta and Juve countered before Atalanta could get men behind.
Kulusevski’s goal was a product of a counter attack and vertical football
Milan in 2019 didn’t have the quick players it had today so therefore it had to rely on vertical balls or diagonal balls from Hakan or Rodriguez and it was one such ball that led to the ball.
Piatek’s goal
WHAT I THINK MILAN SHOULD DO
Of course while Milan’s on paper formation will be a 4-2-3-1 I believe we should defend in a 4-4-1-1 formation with Rebic behind Leao and Hakan acting as a Left Midfielder.
Milan should patiently wait for Atalanta to break down and tire them out by not giving space and looking for any opportunity to counter attack.
Theo and Calabria should be act as defensive full-backs unless there is an oppurtuity to counter attack.
In terms of marking Leao or Rebic should play close to De Roon and Toloi as they are prone to easily losing their man and would be helpful in counter-attacks.
It would have been ideal for Milan to have Mandzukic playing as the #9 but since Mandzukic isn’t fit enough Leao would have the duty of holding the ball up.
A key duel will be between Kjaer and Zapata. A player even De Ligt cannot handle Kjaer’s experience and physical trait will come to the fore which makes it extra important for Saelemaekers and Calabria to prevent Atalanta creating numerical advantage on Milan’s right flank.
Of Course defending deep and relying on counter attacks cannot stop an individual piece of brilliance like Malinovskyi hitting it from distance but that’s when Milan needs its goalkeeper Donnarumma to perform one last time if he is not extending his contract
A trip to Torino beckoned for Milan after their historic win at Juventus in a turn of fortunes as Milan gained the upper hand in the race for Champions League spot for next season. With teams playing simultaneously, Milan had the task of winning at another stadium in Turin, the Grand Torino.
Flashbacks of Milan’s 2-0 loss haunted the fans but the morale boost after the 3- victory at the Allianz had Milan fans positive.
LINE-UP
Milan fielded a weakened line-up without the evergreen Zlatan Ibrahimovic who was injured mid-way through the Juventus match and Saelemaekers whose accumulation of yellow cards earned him a suspension.
For Torino, Davide Nicola benched star striker Belotti and their key players such as Rincon, Verdi and Sanabria perhaps keeping in mind they have Spezia at the weekend, which was a more important game.
MORE OR LESS THE SAME FROM TURIN
Pioli stuck to the same game-plan that brought him the success against Juve. He fielded Diaz, Hakan and Castillejo as the triumvirate behind the roaming striker Rebic who ran the channels and hustled Torino’s back 3. Pioli struck the right balance with his teammate chosing caution over aggression (before the match) where he was content for the opposition to push high up while Milan pressed and countered and Torino took the bait.
THE PLAN TO OVERCOME THE 3-5-2
With a 4-2-3-1 Milan’s midfield often seemed to get overloaded whenever opposition teams play a 5 man midfield especially on the center of the pitch.
Milan’s makeshift 3-5-2. Look how Hakan is a RWB. Kessie, Bennacer are Double Pivot Diaz as an attacking midfielder and Theo as the LWB
To counter this Pioli as I mentioned above fielded Hakan and Diaz, 2 attacking midfielders leaving the left wing vacant. Whenever Milan won the ball Diaz, Hakan and Castillejo would dart forward occupying space rather than an assigned position. Whenever Milan built from the back one of Hakan or Diaz would drop into midfield while one of them stay top to support Rebic. This is a clear example of Milan’s “fluid formation” setup where the team principles are centered on zones rather than positions.
One of the key features of Pioli’s game in Fiorentina was the formation of Passing Diamonds. Milenkovic would push up and with 2 midfielders and a forward, fiorentina would form a passing diamond. Milan given so much space by Torino, were easily forming them all over the pitch to beat the press
MILAN’S PRESSING
One of the key ideas behind Pioli’s Milan had been Milan’s pressing and Milan pressed Torino out of the park.
Milan’s Horizontal press
From horizontal pressing to the build up from the 3rd goal from Kessie Milan forced Torino into errors and moved the ball with quick vertical passes
It can be seen from the pressing stats how Milan were so effective in pressing. Kessie topped in pressure % ( the amount of pressing done which was successful). Kessie topped the charts with 83.3% with Rebic coming 2nd with 50% and Kjaer/Tomori coming a joint 3rd.
TORINO’S GAME PLAN AND GAP IN DEFENSE
Initially Torino’s idea was to defend in a 5-2-3 formation isolating Bennacer with pressing traps and defend deep but with Milan taking the lead they had to push forward.
Trying to squeeze Bennacer for space
Torino usually countered through either Simone Zaza or Wilfred Singo trying to take advantage of the space left by the advancing Theo. To push Milan deep into their own half and press, Nicola had Bremer overlap and join the midfield to try and press Hakan along with joining the attack. Mandragora would compensate for the numbers sitting deep and acting as the anchor
A huge problem torino faced was the gap between Torino’s Center-back and the Left Center-Back which got breached more than thrice ultimately ending in Lyanco fouling Samu Castillejo for the penalty.
TORINO’S MISTAKE
One of the main questions from yesterday’s match I had was why did Torino press up so high even when they were 4-0 down ? Usually teams that chase a score of a 2-1 or a 3-1 or even a 3-2 press high up the pitch leaving only 1 defender behind but Torino were pressing Milan even when they were 5-0 down.
During Milan’s 6th goal Torino’s last man was inside Milan’s half.
You can see from below chart that Torino’s line was as high 60 metres up the match, like how a star studded team chasing a game against minnows would play. All Milan had to do was wait for Torino to come into their half, break up play and launch quick counters with vertical passes.
THE FALSE 9
One of the advantages of a false 9 is that the defender does not have a fixed target to mark and thus it causes confusion and the defender to be drawn out of position. The danger is that intelligent defenders can easily nullify the false 9 (unless he is a Messi or similar) and make him redundant.
However against Torino the false 9, Ante Rebic, ran rings around Torino’s defense. He drew defenders out, scored a hat trick and crossed well for giving an assist for Theo.
ATHELTIC STATS
Here are Milan’s athletic stats for the game
Rafael Leao’s 34 kmph seems to have been the run he made to catch up to Meite’s forward pass and put it on a plate for Rebic to score.
As usual kessie covers the most distance in the game, the engine that he has been kessie has been by far Milan’s best player this season.
Hakan is getting pressed by Genoa CB Radovanovich
Hakan as an AM is too predictable. He occupies the half spaces so opposition teams set him up with pressing traps. They leave him open to recieve the ball once the recived the ball he will be pressed by 2 people
Milan pressing using cover shadows aka cutting off passing lanes
Genoa 5-3-2 off the ball to press Milan and neutralise our double pivot
In the second half Genoa shifted to a 3-4-3 with the wide Midfielders pushing inside and the Center backs overlapping like the picture above. The player taking the shot is masiello, he is an overlappinf CB
A short while after Milan huffed and puffed to a victory against Genoa at the San Siro, the New York Times broke a sensational news that a rumoured super league which has been on the horizon a couple of times could come to fruition as soon as that evening.
Naturally Social media descended into chaos, opinions split and a lot of debating took in the last 24 hours.
As a milan I thought I would like to compile my thoughts on why as a Milan fan I support this Move.
FFP
The main reason why Milan’s rise to the top gets delayed is FFP. Although Milan have owners with adequate capital UEFA’s FFP rules prevent Milan from investing.
However this rule has not been applied in a uniform manner to all. Clubs like City, PSG, Barcelona (who are in a mountain of debt as against Milan’s minimal debt) spend €100-200M year on year with no sanctions from the “Fair Play watchdog”. If the super league idea goes forward, FFP will be removed and Milan can invest into good upcoming players just like the days of Berlusconi.
STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND STAGNATION
With the current system of Serie A, no Italian club earns enough money to challenge the big clubs. Juve who earn the biggest amount in Italy are not even in top 10 richest clubs in the world and it shows how Italian football is far behind commercially. If Milan are to ever circumvent FFP and challenge for the top with a stagnant league structure and extensive red Tapeism in the FIGC then it’s never gonna happen.
With clubs projected to recieve upto €3.5B a year, it will help Milan and Inter to make a new stadium and have a good management structure and good team (on and off the pitch) inside the club
DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH ?
With Milan having money to invest, they can finally invest in the Primavera and develop players and bring in the best players in the world through the famous academy.
CONCLUSION
In Conclusion, there is a lot of aversion to the idea with UEFA trying every measure to re-gain it’s monopoly on the premier competition that is the Champions League. Yes it would alienate the smaller club and the huge funnel of money to these smaller clubs would die and clubs not in the super league could find it hard.
Maybe clubs esp the 12 founding members are more interested in using the Super League as a tool to gain certain powers when UEFA plans to reform the current tournament format.
The fulcrum of Milan’s squad Ismael Bennacer is considered as the Deep Lying playmaker of the double pivot in Milan’s 4-2-3-1. While Kessie is more of the Defensive midfielder and a player who initiates the press, Bennacer forms passing triangles with the Center-backs and helps in passing out from the back.
While Sandro Tonali has been slowing growing into this role, he still lacks the calm and maturity displayed by Bennacer and also the physicality he brings to the fray
He is coveted by a few teams namely PSG and Manchester City and here with Pep Guardiola rumored to be a big favourite of the player, Bennacer has no lack of offers from better teams.
As a devil’s advocate here are a few reasons why selling Bennacer is a good idea for Milan
https://t.co/aor1JtYBZe REASONS Milan chose to sit out of the 19/20 UEFA Europa League after reaching an agreement with UEFA to scrub clean its accounts while UEFA would give them breathing time until 2021/22. In an exercise to do some Milan have engaged in massive cost cuts and “creative” transfer markets.
One such transfer activity was Bennacer in the Transfer Window of 2019 where he was brought in for 16 Million from a relegated Empoli. With a release clause valid of 50 Million valid from this summer, Bennacer gives a good capital gain (plusvalenza) if he is sold at his RC of 50 Million. His current book value stands at 9.6 Million and if sold at 50 Million Milan stand to make 40.4 Million profit on the player. With Milan making a profit of 24 Million on Suso last summer, 40 Million would give Milan some leeway as the purchase of Tonali and Tomori who are on loan at Milan looks set to be complete.
2.TACTICAL REASONS With Milan acquiring a natural Regista suited to play in a 3 man midfield in Tonali, Milan need 2 midfielders to flank both players to help the coach have tactical variety in midfield. With a regista and a defensive midfielder capable of covering huge amount of ground in Kessie Milan need a player who can not only link defense to attack but also assume playmaking abilities. With natural No.10’s slowly getting phased out of the game it is upon the midfielders notably the mezzala’s to create chances for forwards and wingers.
Bennacer who is more comfortable playing a deeper role and away from the press can be sacrificed for bringing in a more attack minded midfielder that can not only put in the workrate but also link defence to attack and thread attackers through on goal.
3.INJURY REASON One of the reasons’s for Milan’s fall post January was the injury to bennacer. Only having 841 minutes under his belt this season, bennacer has shown that, compared to Kessie, he is not able to withstand the intense physical requirements of the game style set up by Pioli and has been injury prone for months.
Milan have not been dealing well with injuries and if luck has it, Milan would be wise to sell the player when his stock his high before his value plummets due to injuries and Milan are forced to sell the player for less or release him from his contract. At a time where Milan’s finances are not at its best it could potentiall block a deal for Milan to sign an upgrade or a replacement or a player in another position.
Milan got back to winning ways against Fiorentina at the Artemio Franchi with a gritty 3-2 win in a well fought match. Here is a tactical analysis of the match.
LINE-UPS
Milan lined up in their usual 4-2-3-1 formation while Fiorentina lined up in an unusual 4-4-2 formation basically to press Milan further up the field while not compromising space in the wings if Milan counter attacks
FIORENTINA ON AND OFF THE BALL.
Off the ball Fiorentina maintained a midfield double pivot and 2 wide men and defended in a 4-4-2 formation with Ribery and Vlahovic pressing Milan’s 2 center-backs.
Fiorentina 4-4-2 off the ball
On the ball Fiorentina played a assymetric 3-4-2-1 with Milenkovic and Pezella staying as the center-backs and Martinez and Caceres pushing forward as the full backs. Esseyric and Ribery played behind Vlahovic.
RESPECT FOR RIBERY
While Ribery may be at the far end of his career, Ribery has proven that he is no spent force and needs to be respected. Pioli certainly did that and assigned his best player in the form of Frank the Tank Kessie to follow Ribery like a shadow wherever he goes. Kessie kept Ribery quiet for a good part of the game but was slow to react to his run from outside the box for Fiorentina’s second goal.
Kessie man marking Ribery
FIORENTINA’S PRESS AND MILAN’S COUNTER
Fiorentina like all recent teams who pressed Milan out of the park, tried to stop Milan from passing out from the back. They had Vlahovic and Ribery press the center-backs and Pulgar press Kessie.
Fiorentina’s high pressMilan using Theo to break the press
Milan tried to break this press by passing towards Dalot and then using Kjaer to quickly switch play and have interplay between Theo and Hakan who would break free of the pressing of Bonaventura or Pulgar.
FIORENTINA’S HIGH LINE
Once again Fiorentina’s idea was to press and therefore they played a high line and this was easily pierced by Kjaer with a long ball over the the top for Zlatan’s goal.
Notice how high the line of defense is.
CONCLUSION
It was bracing to see a Milan so inconsistent come back from 2-1 down to win 3-2. Hopefully this provides the team with confidence to power through the last 10 games and confirm the Champions League spot or even Win the the scudetto.
In a blast past from the past, 2 European heavy weights A.C.Milan and Manchester United faced off in the Europa League Round of 16. Both teams were nursing injuries as Milan had Ibrahimovic, Mandzukic, Theo, Hakan, Bennacer, Rebic all ruled out with prior injuries. The game finished in a 1-1 draw with Milan getting the all-important away goal before the teams meet at the San Siro next Thursday. Here is a tactical analysis of the contest.
LINE-UPS
Both teams lined up in their usual 4-2-3-1 formation with Milan opting for a Double pivot of Meite and Kessie and Ole opting for Matic and Mctominay.
MILAN’S HIGH PRESS
Milan made their intentions very clear right from minute 1 and that is that Milan would press United and try to hit them on the counter as long as United would keep the ball. United, who used a patient build up, were pressed by Milan using cover shadows aka cutting off passing lanes.
United would often have their center-backs placed wide and dean Henderson push up and have matic or mctominay sit back and form passing triangles and play out of the back.
With Pace at the back to recover lose balls or to cover for counter attacks, Tomori and Simon Kjaer would come off their defensive lines and help with the press often leading to Milan creating quick counter which could not be sustained by United but didn’t lead to goals due to poor finishing.
ZONAL MARKING
A very rare aspect was Zonal marking used by Milan to mark Bruno rather than have a player man mark. Pioli instructions were clear, if Bruno was in your zone then cut off the passes to him since Bruno always has this knack of finding spaces and creating havoc.
DIAZ BETWEEN THE LINES
Milan whenever they won the ball back from United would aim to find Diaz would sit between the United lines finding pockets of space and looking to farm it wide or play a vertical pass for Leao.
SPACE BETWEEN MILAN’S LINES
A big disadvantage of Milan’s 4-2-3-1 is that when the double pivot presses forward it creates a gap between the pivot and the back line. Intelligent Mf’s like Bruno can easily find space between the lines. A similar mistake can be seen vs Crvena. It was this sequence of play that led to the free kick which led to a looping ball over the head of Tomori for Amad to score.
UNITED’S GAMEPLAN
Off the ball and deep into their territory United had one of their double pivot (usually Mctominay) drop into the defence to create extra numbers.
On the ball they played a hybrid 2-3-5 which also looked like an assymetric 3-5-2. Greenwood would tuck in as a second striker behind Martial making space for AWB to make overlapping runs.
United enganged in a horizontal press trying to push Milan to the sidelines with AWB, Greenwood and Bruno Fernandes pressing Milan to their wings.
SUBSTITUTIONS AND COUNTER-TACTICS
Later in the game Milan introduced Tonali as a make-shift Regista, and pushed Kessie up to trouble Mctominay and Matic esp Mctominay who was on a yellow card. To counter this, Ole brought in Fred to man mark Tonali and upset his passing rhythm.
CONCLUSION
Milan were certainly the better team on the day and will go to the San Siro feeling they could have taken this game had Kessie’s goal not been wrongly ruled out and if Krunic and Saelemaekers had taken their chance. An away goal means Milan have an advantage, but United away from home have a very good record and Milan at home have not been excellent. With both sides expecting players to return it sets up for a feisty second leg.